In the wake of three shockingly heretical statements, Professor Roberto de Mattei has published an article defending Francis' claim to the papacy. But does it stand up to scrutiny?
At some level, I wonder if Bergoglio is goading people into defending him and forcing them to stay stupid. If my understanding of personality is correct, he relishes the power his statements elicit when they force people to look dumb defending him...
At some level, I wonder if Bergoglio is goading people into defending him and forcing them to stay stupid. If my understanding of personality is correct, he relishes the power his statements elicit when they force people to look dumb defending him...
The question is, why are these people “feeling forced” to defend him? What is their actual motivation?